Futures
Standardised contracts with expiration dates, contract-specific sizing and daily settlement mechanics. Margin here means something different from margin on a stock.
11 min read · intermediate · lesson 5 of 6
What this covers
- Read a contract specification and say what one contract actually represents
- Separate margin, notional exposure and planned trade risk
- Convert a tick into a currency amount for a specific contract
- Account for expiration, settlement style and the roll
- Explain why a continuous chart is not the contract being traded
A standardised obligation
A futures contract is a standardised agreement to buy or sell a specified underlying exposure on terms the exchange sets. Those terms cover the underlying, the contract unit or multiplier, the minimum price fluctuation, the expiration cycle, the settlement method, the trading hours and, where they apply, the delivery terms.
The specifications are standardised. The price is not: it moves continuously as participants trade. Reading the specification is what tells you what one contract represents, and it is published by the exchange for every contract.
Standardisation is what makes centralised trading and clearing possible, because every contract in a series is interchangeable with every other. It also means a participant cannot adjust the multiplier or the delivery terms to suit a position. Different exposure means a different contract, or a different number of them.
Some heavily traded markets offer smaller variants. CME Micro E-mini equity index futures, for example, carry one tenth the multiplier of the corresponding E-mini contract. A smaller contract can allow more precise sizing for a smaller account. Which contract fits a given account is a question the specification answers, and it has to be checked per contract rather than assumed from the pattern.
Margin is a performance bond, not a loan
Equity margin is borrowed money and interest accrues on it. Futures margin is collateral posted to support the financial obligations of the position, commonly described as a performance bond. Opening a futures position is not borrowing the contract's full notional value from the broker.
Two figures matter. Initial margin is generally what establishing the position requires. Maintenance margin is the minimum level associated with keeping it. If losses take account equity below the required level, additional funds may be required, or positions may be reduced or liquidated, depending on the broker and the clearing arrangements. Those procedures are not identical everywhere.
Brokers may also impose margin requirements above the exchange minimums, particularly during periods of elevated volatility. The number that governs a position is the one the broker applies, not the exchange floor.
Gains and losses are settled through the clearing process, which uses settlement prices to determine variation margin. Account equity can also move throughout the session as prices change, so a position going against you is visible well before any daily settlement.
Margin, notional exposure and risk are three different numbers
Margin required is not the maximum that can be lost. This is the single most expensive misunderstanding in the class.
Notional exposure is what the contract controls: the futures price multiplied by the contract multiplier, subject to the contract's quoting convention. It can be many times the margin posted to hold it.
Losses are determined by how far the price moves and by the multiplier, not by how much margin was posted. A position can lose more than the initial margin, which is why a margin call exists at all.
Three separate quantities, and confusing any two of them produces a sizing error: margin is not the contract value, the contract value is not the planned risk, and the planned risk is not a guaranteed maximum loss.
Ticks, and what one is worth
IllustrativeTick size is the minimum price increment a contract trades in. Tick value is what one of those increments is worth on one contract. Both come from the contract specification rather than from the price.
Conceptually the tick value follows from the minimum increment and the contract unit, though quoting conventions differ by product, so the specification is the answer rather than the arithmetic.
Two contracts PecuDesk covers make the point. The S&P 500 E-mini moves in 0.25 index-point ticks on a 50 multiplier, which is 12.50 dollars a tick. Copper moves in 0.0005 ticks on 25,000 pounds, which is also 12.50 dollars a tick.
Identical tick values, and multipliers of 50 against 25,000. What separates the risk of holding one of each is how many ticks the contract travels, which is a property of that market and cannot be read off the tick value or the price.
Figures are from the contract registry the platform uses and are shown to illustrate the shape of the problem. Verify current specifications with the exchange before sizing anything.
Size per contract, every time
One contract is not a universal unit of risk. What a position actually risks depends on the multiplier, the tick value, the volatility of that market, the entry, the distance to the point where the trade is wrong, and how many contracts are held.
Traders arriving from equities are often accustomed to sizing by share count and price. Futures add a layer, because each contract carries its own multiplier and tick economics before volatility is considered at all.
A contract count carried from one market to another is not a transferred position size. It is an unexamined one.
Planned risk, worked through
IllustrativeIllustrative only.
Take a contract with a 12.50 tick value and a risk point 20 ticks from entry. Planned risk per contract is 20 multiplied by 12.50, which is 250. Two contracts is 500.
That is planned risk, not a guaranteed maximum loss. Gaps, slippage, limit conditions and execution failures can all produce a different realised result, and each of them moves the number the wrong way.
The arithmetic is simple. The discipline is doing it against the specific contract every time rather than carrying a number across from the last one.
Expiration, settlement and delivery
A futures position does not continue indefinitely. Each contract expires, and as expiration approaches trading activity often migrates from the expiring contract into a later one. The timing of that migration varies by market, and depends on the product, the expiration cycle, volume, open interest and participant behaviour.
Settlement works one of two broad ways. A cash-settled contract is financially settled against the contract's final settlement procedure, and no physical asset changes hands. A physically deliverable contract provides for delivery of the underlying under exchange rules.
Physically deliverable contracts can create delivery obligations if held into the relevant process. In practice many retail brokers impose earlier close-out deadlines or prevent clients from entering delivery at all, so the operative deadline is often the broker's rather than the exchange's.
For some physically delivered contracts the important operational date falls before final expiration. First notice day and last trading day are the two to know for the specific contract, and they are published in its specification. Among the contracts covered here that matters most for the metals and energy products.
The curve, the roll and basis
Holding a view past an expiration means rolling: closing the expiring contract and opening a later one. The two trade at different prices, and the shape of that difference has names. Contango is later-dated contracts trading above nearer-dated ones. Backwardation is later-dated contracts trading below.
The gap between two contracts is not by itself a realised loss or profit on the roll. What a rolling position actually earns depends on how prices evolve, the shape of the curve and how it changes, when the roll happens, the strategy, transaction costs and how prices converge into expiration.
The accurate statement is narrower than the folklore: for strategies that maintain continuous exposure by repeatedly rolling, the shape and evolution of the curve can materially affect long-run returns. Contango does not mean every roll loses, and backwardation does not mean every roll pays.
Futures and spot prices are not necessarily the same before expiration, and that difference is commonly called basis. As expiration approaches, the futures price and the relevant settlement reference generally converge under the contract's settlement mechanics. That is the reason different expiration months trade at different prices at the same moment.
A continuous chart is not the contract you are trading
A continuous futures chart is a constructed historical series, not one contract that traded across the whole period. Charting systems join contracts together, and the method differs between them.
Depending on the construction they may leave the roll gaps in place, back-adjust historical prices, ratio-adjust them, or use another continuation method. Two providers can show different historical levels for the same market.
So a level read off a continuous chart may not correspond to a price the current contract ever traded. Check any level that matters against the contract actually being traded.
Exchange-level controls and market structure
Exchange-traded futures carry centralised rules and clearing that differ from decentralised or fragmented markets. Contracts are standardised, volume is consolidated, and open interest is published.
Some futures markets use price limits, circuit breakers, trading halts, position limits or accountability levels. Which of these applies, and how, is contract-specific rather than uniform across the class.
Where a market becomes limit-locked, liquidity can disappear and a position may not be exitable at the intended price. This is the direct link back to planned risk: a stop distance is a plan, and an exchange-level restriction is one of the conditions under which the realised loss exceeds it.
A clearing organisation is interposed between counterparties, which reduces bilateral counterparty exposure and centralises the management of collateral and settlement. It changes where the risk sits rather than removing it.
Centralised trading also produces centralised data: traded volume, open interest and contract-specific prices. Spot foreign exchange is decentralised, so no single venue observes total global spot volume.
What PecuDesk covers
Eight CME contracts. Equity index: ES (S&P 500), NQ (Nasdaq 100), YM (Dow). Metals: GC (Gold), SI (Silver), HG (Copper). Energy: CL (Crude Oil), NG (Natural Gas). Together they provide exposure across major US equity indices, metals and energy markets.
The platform reads the state of those markets: where price sits against the structure that matters, how participants are positioned, the volatility conditions, and the contract context that changes what a position represents. It describes that state. It does not tell you which contract to trade or which side to take.
Key takeaways
- Futures are standardised exchange-traded contracts, each with its own multiplier, tick size and settlement rules.
- Margin is collateral supporting the position, not a loan financing its full notional value.
- Margin required is not the maximum that can be lost.
- Tick value and multiplier decide what a contract represents, and both come from the specification.
- One contract does not carry comparable risk across different futures markets.
- Planned risk and realised loss can differ, through gaps, slippage or exchange-level restrictions.
- Contracts expire, and activity migrates to later expirations on a timetable that varies by market.
- Settlement is cash or physical delivery depending on the contract, and brokers often close retail positions before delivery.
- A continuous chart is a constructed series and may not match the contract being traded.
- The shape and evolution of the curve can materially affect returns from continuously rolled exposure.
Common mistakes
- Treating margin as the maximum amount that can be lost.
- Sizing by contract count without checking the tick value and multiplier.
- Assuming one contract carries similar risk across different markets.
- Assuming a stop guarantees the intended maximum loss.
- Ignoring expiration and the migration of activity to a later contract.
- Holding a physically deliverable contract toward its delivery deadlines without knowing the broker's rules.
- Reading a continuous chart as though one contract traded for the whole period.
- Assuming contango means every roll loses, or backwardation means every roll pays.
- Trading a contract without reading its exchange specification.
Knowledge check
OptionalRelated
- Indices and commoditiesAsset Classes
- Leverage and marginMarket Foundations